On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:52, Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 03 June 2011, Eric Hameleers wrote: >> Kevin, it was not meant as a stab at you and your KDE team. My >> apologies if it came across like that. I do like Redhat's Linux, use >> it on a daily basis on my laptop even. I also respect Fedora as a >> testing ground and a distro in itself. >> No more bad words about your employer. > > FYI, I do not work for Red Hat, I'm one of the community Fedora packagers > (currently doing a GSoC 2011 project with Fedora, otherwise unpaid). It just > rubs me the wrong way when our project's main sponsor gets attacked for no > reason. > > That said, your apologies are accepted. :-) > >> If you want to give people a feeling of unity (pun intended) when >> running KDE it should not be given to packagers as a shambles of small >> un-coordinated source tarballs. > > I agree with you there.
It's still [email protected] not release-team-ark, release-team-marble etc etc. Why would split tarballs for 4.7 be an uncoordinated shambles? So far the main reason against it seems to be that it would be kind of a pain in dealing with your internal bureaucracy of adding new SRPMs. _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
