On Wednesday 17 June 2009 23:59:51 Tom Albers wrote: > Op Wednesday 17 June 2009 23:48 schreef u: > > To me (as a semi-outsider) the best option seems to be to leave > > everything as it is for now and revisit the split of kdepim into > > runtime and apps when all apps have been ported to Akonadi (or when the > > amount of parallel branches has dropped again after GSOC is finished). > > Mailody is ready for a beta cycle / release, but i refuse to do that while > depending on the whole of kdepim. So I really would prefer it for 4.3. > > > If kdepim/akonadi is independent of the rest in kdepim then it can still > > be packaged in a kdepim-runtime tarball even if it is not moved to > > kdepim/runtime/akonadi or kdepim/runtime or whatever. > > That's the plan I think.
It's probably a good idea to ask packagers what they think about it. kde- [email protected] is the right list to address. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
