Hi Thomas, On 05.03.26 15:12, Thomas Corte wrote:
And yet, both RPP and EoH cause more headaches for *registars*, as they'll have to deal with more diversity regarding registry connectivity (as if there weren't enough bells and whistles in EPP already).
to put things straight, RPP is chartered to be an alternative to RPP, not replacement.
So far the experience of registries offering HTTP-based APIs alongside of EPP, found an acceptance of over 40% of the registrars. Especially smaller ones and new ones. There was a lot on this in RPP BoF [1]. My conversations with other, also bigger registrars were along the lines: we would love to use RESTful APIs but please come around with a standard, which will work same with many TLDs, not singular solutions.
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/121/session/rpp Kind Regards, Pawel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
