Thank you, Tom,

Regards

-éric

From: Tom Harrison <t...@apnic.net>
Date: Wednesday, 4 June 2025 at 23:57
To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyn...@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geof...@ietf.org 
<draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geof...@ietf.org>, regext-cha...@ietf.org 
<regext-cha...@ietf.org>, regext@ietf.org <regext@ietf.org>, 
gavin.br...@icann.org <gavin.br...@icann.org>, jin...@wide.ad.jp 
<jin...@wide.ad.jp>
Subject: Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-12: 
(with COMMENT)
Hi Éric,

Thanks for your review and feedback.

On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 02:37:47AM -0700, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
> ### Section 2.3
>
> Like Ketan, I cannot refrain from wondering why "geofeed1" rather than
> "geofeed" ? Section 9.1 hints to a version number but all other extensions
> registered at IANA do not have such a version in the name altough some use 
> '_0'
> or '_1', this format is clearer IMHO.

We've added text to the document clarifying that this is operating as
a version number.  Regarding the underscore, per comments on the RIR
search document,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions/ is
an attempt to make this space more consistent, and it directs that
underscores not be used in new extension identifiers.

-Tom
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to