Thanks for the review, Roman. More below... > -----Original Message----- > From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > Sent: Friday, May 2, 2025 12:01 PM > To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-regext-epp-...@ietf.org; regext-cha...@ietf.org; > regext@ietf.org; > jkol...@godaddy.com; jkol...@godaddy.com > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-24: > (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-24: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://secure- > web.cisco.com/1KgsPq2akIjYxTRmfp19mhCwViIJ3EKKuQmrn6EUY9UhOVe6 > EilOV9li2qbxX4gHTGfDOTIBXJ7up7V3vQsm3Kg33rHIYqNziJIVJDu3XSGc9CDvi > OhtW5b9iq9Lbx81DZ7kih7fKwfI6uNMg7AiTDNqMhS6OsHy_If6- > H9OpR7B9tkS-mjXU7AD4uuabf29_Bdzzbpu1m5cloDI6SmzFaO71- > 89GRESMmYgLneYqXcPfrJfHtNLOt7uqrGOaByCQAQuu9sagMoB-wncnfm5- > zrUcMCi8fEVd5R-YArw0e_E- > pCDRWRxV0e455RS_ztEL/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fabout%2Fgrou > ps%2Fiesg%2Fstatements%2Fhandling-ballot-positions%2F > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://secure-web.cisco.com/13E- > VDFnalfuoA6fkro8kq41LCQvcIzE9iitavDDUhywbBJ3gJnyS5JMjO_xnJYt8JRm > Wj0v- > NUJNLvzONEZIRMQkBggivlfqP3LHywxKIPga60_mrT5AmRmiqKcKnCN6uNWs > HPCPEaCszZVnJHhKN7Alon6klDqu5WRQyEoSMcrEPfoR0NXUc7APn- > nkP3AitS00rEyitiSk_RtAWIDyzfozYVU8aY72k5- > oJ8mfS8blGhnv4GEqAIeJgJN5YARX- > iamfAZ31MiiKFEACYEXAj2T3Ct8mIhkp1rpZEOm1AaT8DUpcQSBThWaHMptY > sFx/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-epp- > eai%2F > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ** Section 6.1. This section uses a formal language (XML Schema) to define a > syntax without normatively citing the language. Please cite XML Schema. > Consider using this reference. > > [W3C.REC-xmlschema-1-20041028] > Thompson, H., Beech, D., Maloney, M., and N. Mendelsohn, > "XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition", World Wide > Web Consortium Recommendation REC-xmlschema-1-20041028, > October 2004, > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028>.
[SAH] OK, this is a good idea and the correct reference. I'll add a normative reference. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you to Pete Resnick for the GENART review. > > ** Section 3. > * The value set for the <contact:disclose><contact:email/> "flag" > attribute MUST also be applied to all additional email addresses > that are added by a contact extension. > > I don’t understand this notion of “<contact:disclose><contact:email/> ‘flag’”, > what element contains the flag attribute? [SAH] That's described fully in Section 2.9 of RFC 5733. An appropriate reference can be added. > > ** Section 4.2.1 > * Email address validation based on SMTPUTF8 validation rules > defined in Section 2 > > Most of the other bullet points in this list start with a verb. Therefore, > I’m > guessing that this validation requirement is about supporting "email address > validation"? Should this read “Support email address …” [SAH] Yes, correct. That should be fixed. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
