Hi Pawel, I like Domain Connect, i tried it in real world use case and it works very well, so definitely a +1 for DC as something that needs to be standardized. but, is creating a separate wg just for DC not a lot of overhead for you?
as you probably already know, there is now some discussion in dnsop about its mission and charter, https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/9aztqcxfpgCEkhQT3LGxkWuMui8/ maybe now would be a good time to again try to get the dnsop folks or maybe a new broader dnsapp wg (dnsop spinoff for dns related applications) to adopt this work? - Maarten Op 24 apr 2025, om 09:20 heeft Pawel Kowalik <kowa...@denic.de> het volgende geschreven: Hi, After the AD decision not to proceed with the domain connect draft as AD-sponsored the preferred way forward seems to be forming a working group tasked with this work. Orie asked me to propose a charter text and initiate the discussion here. I kept the charter in a very narrow scope, so that this potentially new working group can finish the work in a foreseeable timeframe. Please feel free to comment in the document directly or provide feedback over the mailing list. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fDVD4RoJ0vHJ5CsSlshZpzm5dfq145sb There was a number of people, who expressed interest for this work and in the potential working group in the previous discussion. A feedback or even +1 would be of a value. Thanks. PS: cross-posting to all working groups with potential interest, but please just post (and subscribe) to dconn mailing list when responding. Kind Regards, Pawel <OpenPGP_0xABB62115F7BCDB04.asc>_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
