Hi Marco, Is the intention to develop an adapter to map RPP -> EPP? I wondered whether it might be simpler to go the other way round, so map EPP -> RPP. That way, RPP doesn't have to worry about session management. There may be good reasons I'm not thinking of why RPP -> EPP makes more sense though!
Thanks, Ruth On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 11:18, Marco Davids (IETF IMAP) <marco.davids= 40sidn...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Dear folk, > > Please ignore my previous (encrypted...!) email. > (and sorry for the inconvenience) > > ------ > > We’d like to inform you that a Hackathon proposal for RPP has been > submitted for the IETF 122 Hackathon. > > > https://wiki.ietf.org/en/meeting/122/hackathon#restful-provisioning-protocol-rpp > > On behalf of my co-chair, Gavin, and myself. > > -- > Marco & Gavin > Co-chairs RPP WG > > > > _______________________________________________ > rpp mailing list -- r...@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpp-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
