# Orie Steele, ART AD, comments for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-08
CC @OR13

* line numbers:
  -
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-geofeed-08.txt&submitcheck=True

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

## Comments

### geofeed1

```
13   This document defines a new Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
14   extension, "geofeed1", for indicating that an RDAP server hosts
```

Are we expecting geofeed2 ? If space is not a huge concern, a more
qualified name would seem advisable.

rdap_geofeed_v1?


### MAY contain zero or more?

```
154   An IP network object returned by an RDAP server may contain zero,
155   one, or multiple geofeed link objects.  An example scenario where
```

Consider making this normative:

An IP network object returned by an RDAP server MAY contain zero or more
geofeed link objects.

## Nits

### Reads awkwardly

```
249   inetnum objects (per [RFC9632]), clients who find a geofeed link
250   object within an IP network object MUST ignore geofeed data from that
251   link that is outside the IP network object's address range.
```

that link that -> any link that ?
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to