Hi,

From: kowa...@denic.de <kowa...@denic.de>
Date: Friday, January 10, 2025 at 12:58 PM
To: Andrew Newton (andy) <a...@hxr.us>
Cc: regext@ietf.org <regext@ietf.org>
Subject: [regext] Re: Extensions: Extension identifier case-insensitivity #50
Hi Andrew,

On 10.01.25 17:54, Andrew Newton (andy) wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 8:53 AM <kowa...@denic.de> wrote:
>> [PK] I do not have very hard feelings about changing this MUST NOT but there 
>> will be consequences, that MUST NOT will block those extremely marginal  but 
>> VALID cases (like the one I mentioned above, but maybe some others that do 
>> not come to mind now) creating possibly more harm, like a very new 
>> identifier instead of an editorial case correction. Possible harm of 
>> "strong" and narrow defined SHOULD NOT seems to be less. This goes through 
>> DEs review anyway, so they can definitely make the right call.
>>
> Unless I misread the thread, you gave a hypothetical scenario but not
> an example use case. Can you spell out something more concrete?
> Otherwise, I cannot see the value in having both "DeNic" and "DENic"
> registered as two separate identifiers.

Maybe hypothetical, maybe not - depending where we land in all
discussions around camel case, all lowcase etc.
[JS] IIUC, per our discussion on camel-casing so far, object class names will 
also be camel-cased, like JSON names, to help differentiate better from the 
extension identifier prefixed with an underscore.
If the recommendation
would turn some of existing extensions to be on the wrong side then
changing case of an existing registration may be a real scenario.

Anyway I don't want to spend too much time on this issue.
[JS] To summarize our discussion on this topic so far: 1) Change “extension 
identifiers are case-sensitive” (inadvertent) to “extension identifiers are 
case-insensitive”. 2) Leave “extension identifiers MUST NOT be registered where 
a new identifier is a mixed-case version of an existing identifier” as-is since 
the marginal cases justifying a SHOULD NOT seem highly unlikely.

Jasdip



_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to