On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 4:48 PM Jasdip Singh <jasd...@arin.net> wrote: > > https://github.com/anewton1998/draft-regext-rdap-extensions/issues/46 > > > > >> Section 2.1.1, paragraph 1 > > >> Some extensions exist to denote the usage of values placed into an IANA > >> registry, such as the IANA RDAP registries, or the usage of extensions for > >> specifications used in RDAP responses, such as extended vCard/jCard > >> properties. Such extensions exist to "mark" these usages and are often > >> called "marker" extensions. > > > > > Do we really need 2 terms here? profile and marker seem to me very similar > > in nature of what they are doing. There is also no reference to any of > > those terms in any other place of the document, so this difference does not > > seem to matter. > > > > [JS] Interesting thought. Firstly, this leads to defining a glossary of terms > somewhere to help the reader with a quick comprehension of various > concepts/recommendations in this draft. Secondly, we thought there is > sufficient distinction between “profile” and “marker” to warrant these > “styles” separately. As mentioned above, we will be describing how/when for > the identified extension “styles”. > > > > [TH] I agree that 'marker' and 'profile' could be combined into a single > extension type.
Yup. I agree. _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
