Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-18: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for addressing the previous DISCUSS (and most of my COMMENTS) in the -18 and for the e-mail exchanges. See https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/URDkHLYZCbWNbDD3e-avb6dG160/ for the previous ballot. Regards -éric ## COMMENTS (non-blocking) ### Section 1.2.1.2 It is mostly a DISCUSS point, but why using a "custom" attribute rather a IANA approved RRTYPE ? It adds complexity in the parsing for little value IMHO. ### Section 7 Strongly suggest to add the IANA registry URI as a reference to avoid any ambiguity. ## NITS (non-blocking / cosmetic) ### Section 2.1.1.1 Like written by Erik Kline, please use canonical IPv6 address format, i.e., s/2001:DB8::8:800:200C:417A/2001:db8::8:800:200c:417a/ (this issue appears at least twice in the document). _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
