https://github.com/anewton1998/draft-regext-rdap-extensions/issues/48
>> Section 2.1.2, paragraph 1 >> Extension specifications have customarily defined only one extension >> identifier. However, there is no explicit limit on the number of extension >> identifiers that may be defined in a single extension specification. The >> main reason for defining multiple identifiers is to reserve multiple >> namespaces in URLs or responses: see e.g. [I-D.ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search]. > Is it good or bad? Do we need some normative SHOULD/SHOULD NOT to tell more > when this is a good thing to do and when the extension would rather not do it? [JS] Not sure if it is a good-versus-bad comparison; rather more of a justified need question. > Shall the draft doing it explain why it is required? [JS] Yes.
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
