Hi John and Murray, > On 19 Dec 2024, at 13:44, John Scudder via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > wrote: > > [snip] > > I support Murray’s DISCUSS position re the SHOULD in Section 3.1, although > possibly for a slightly different motivation. I saw the reply to his DISCUSS > to > the effect that you’re saying the operator really had better configure a > policy. As written that’s not clear from the text of the spec: > > “Servers SHOULD restrict the supported DNS record types in accordance with > their own policy.” > > What I took away from that sentence, reading it without benefit of looking at > the list discussion, was “a server should respect configured policy, unless it > doesn’t feel like it, in which case whatever”. Evidently that’s not what you > mean (good!). Perhaps something like, > > “Operators SHOULD configure server policy to restrict the supported DNS record > types, in accordance with their own requirements.”
That's useful feedback, and I agree that wording makes more sense. I will include it in the next version. Thanks, G. -- Gavin Brown Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) https://www.icann.org _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
