Hi Paul, my response is below. > On 17 Dec 2024, at 18:20, Paul Wouters via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > wrote: > > [snip] > > One note: > > Nevertheless, EPP servers which implement this extension MUST restrict the DNS > record types that are accepted in <create> and <update> commands, and included > in <info> responses, allowing only those types that are actually published in > the DNS for domain and host objects. > > This phrasing is not very clear. I think what is meant is "registered > RRtypes", > but right now I could use TYPE98 which is currently an unassigned RRtype value > but if included in a zone would quality "are actually published in the DNS"
Thanks for this comment. Here is my proposed new text: Nevertheless, EPP servers which implement this extension MUST restrict the DNS record types that are accepted in <create> and <update> commands, and included in <info> responses, allowing only those types that are (a) registered in [IANA-RRTYPES] and (b) appropriate for use above a zone cut. Let me know what you think. I don't think it changes the sense of the paragraph but is much clearer. G. -- Gavin Brown Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) https://www.icann.org _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
