Hi Scott,

On 12.09.24 14:39, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: kowa...@denic.de <kowa...@denic.de>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 2:29 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: Re: normative language and references
in draft-ietf-regext-delete-bcp

Hi Scott,

I think I am missing your comment on this issue from the previous thread [1].

  >> I am still not sure how useful it is to have normative language as such in
BCP, especially if it's only used in the section 6, which refers to other 
sections
like 5.1.4.3 which in turn does not contain any normative language at all.
Whether it's a MUST or SHOULD is likely a secondary concern and here at least
I would like to learn the logic behind the change.
[SAH] The value of normative language in a BCP is described in Section 6 of RFC 
2119:

"Imperatives of the type defined in this memo must be used with care and sparingly.  
In particular, they MUST only be used where it is  actually required for interoperation 
or to limit behavior which has  potential for causing harm (e.g., limiting 
retransmisssions)"

"or to limit behavior which has  potential for causing harm". The guidance found in 
Section 6 of the draft uses normative language in the spirit of limiting behavior which has 
potential for causing harm. As it says in the draft, "with minimal undesired side 
effects".

[PK] This was not exactly my concern.

Section 6 refers to 5.1.4.3 as one of alternatives of MUST.

5.1.4.3 reads: "EPP clients MAY rename the host object to be deleted...". This is followed by "This requires that the client maintain...". I would expect some normative language here to be able to follow the recommendation of Section 6.

The same applies to the other alternatives of section 6.


When you mention "limit behavior which has potential for causing harm" a Recommendation with a normative MUST NOT to practices which actually cause harm would be of benefit from this BCP.


Kind Regards,

Pawel

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to