> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Newton (andy) <a...@hxr.us> > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 8:27 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap- > extensions-02.txt > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > Hi all, > > This new version of the draft has a couple of new sections. > > Two of the new sections call for the addition of more expert reviewers for the > IANA RDAP registries and for the reviewers to check each others work. > > And the other two sections regard security considerations and privacy > considerations. > > Let us know what you think.
[SAH] Andy, I'd very much prefer that we discuss changes like this BEFORE they appear in a working group draft. I don't necessarily disagree with the suggestions, but if we assume that a working group draft is a reflection of working group consensus it makes more sense to discuss significant change proposals on this mailing list before they're committed to the draft. Now I have to read it very carefully to make sure I don't miss something important... 😊 Some of what the draft proposes requires updates to RFCs 9082 and 9083. They're full standards. Doesn't that raise a process question that we need to discuss? I do like the idea of adding additional reviewers and guidance for their responsibilities. I'll share more feedback after I re-read it all again, this time very carefully. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
