Gavin
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:46 AM Gavin Brown <gavin.br...@icann.org> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > On 31 Jul 2024, at 16:35, Tim Wicinski via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > wrote: > > Reviewer: Tim Wicinski > > Review result: Ready > > > Hi, > > I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft. The > DNS Directorate seeks to review all DNS or DNS-related drafts as > they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special > request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the ADs. > For more information about the DNS Directorate, please see > https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/dnsdir > > Status: Minor Nit, Ready to go > > I reviewed this document earlier from a request on the regext list, and > sent some minor feedback which the Author has incorporated into the > current version. > > I like and approve of the section on Operational Considerations. > > ## NIT of question > > The Nit tool popped these out: > > ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 7451 > > -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'XSD-DATATYPES' > > Now 7451 seems to be referenced informally by most documents, including > most > mapping additions https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7451/referencedby/ > > > I will fix this in my working copy. > thanks I have no opinions currently on the XSD-DATATYPES reference. > > > Without this reference, this document would still have transitive > normative reference to XSD-DATATYPES as RFC 5730 also has it as a normative > reference. So I think the reference should be normative but am open to an > argument to make it informative. > I think it should be normative also, and was thinking the same thing. I only flagged as the nits tool did as more of something for the document shepherd to make a note of - it's been discussed and the WG feels this is correct. ## worthless NIT > > In running one of my grammart thingies on the text it complained about > this in > Section 10.12 of the change log > > Add *the the* Verisign EPP SDK to Section 9 > > > This section will be removed when the document gets published as an RFC, > but I will fix it anyway :) > I knew/know it would be removed and I must apologize for being so pedantic. tim
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
