On 7/31/24 11:08, kowa...@denic.de wrote:
I am a bit concerned about this draft. We finished WG LC with version
-05, then both -06 and -07 appeared without any discussion on the
mailing list.
It would be ok if there would be just nits, but -06 changed normative
language and -07 now reshaped the recommendation section effectively
putting all practices into the same bucket. I think it was correct in
the previous version to make a clear distinction that only the first
practice is clear to have "minimal undesired side effects". The other
two are proposed practices, which are neither implemented nor tested
by anyone, therefore IMHO shall be clearly marked as such.
Kind Regards,
Pawel
Hi Pawel,
These changes are a result of the shepherd review in checking normative
references and normative language (see my other email, which was likely
sent when you sent this :) ).
Would you be satisfied if the first recommendation was labeled with
"This practice has been observed in use." and the other two
recommendations are labeled with "This practice has not been observed in
use."?
-andy
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
