Hi,
I've attended the meetings since Prague but am not an EPP person. Permit me
to offer a different perspective, based on what you've been saying about
the other topics of discussion.
When you've talked about EPP during those meetings, you talked about the
data model, the commands, but you hardly ever mentioned XML. XML didn't
sound like a core part of the EPP that exists in your minds. I heard many
arguments against or in favour of one proposal or another, but noone stood
up and the mike to say "because … XML", see? XML seems about as central as
TCP.
On this view, REPP might be called an unanticipated extension. If the data
model and commands don't change at all, then this isn't the kind of
extension that 5730-3 define, but it does extend that which you talk about
as being EPP.
On the other hand, if the data model or commands do change… so I suggest
that a separate WG makes sense if and only if REPP is permitted to change
the data model or commands.
Arnt
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
