The work should be done. I have no strong view to REGEXT or a new group, I have previously observed it's the same people in the room, even if we divide-and-conquer. If we do go to a new WG I ask that we try to narrow charter scope and not become "the WG which lives forever"
-George On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 11:00 AM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> wrote: > > Hi, > > I said that we heard 2 paths forward: > > - recharter / expand existing charter > - new working group > > If you feel strongly about this topic, I welcome any comments on this list or > to me or the chairs privately. > > There seems to be energy to do this work, I'll work with you all to find the > right approach. > > Thanks to the authors and chairs for the presentation in today's meeting. > > Regards, > > OS, ART AD > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024, 3:35 PM Maarten Wullink <maarten.wull...@sidn.nl> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Thank you all, for the comments and suggestions during our discussion >> earlier today about RESTful EPP. >> The Area Director suggested we create a new working group for this and >> similar work. >> >> If you are interested in joining us, to discuss and write a concept charter >> for this new WG, we have organised a side meeting for this on Thursday. >> Online participation is also an option, the URL will be added to the wiki >> shortly. >> >> Room: Tennyson >> Time: 1300-14:00 >> URL: https://wiki.ietf.org/en/meeting/120/sidemeetings >> >> Best, >> >> Maarten >> > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
