> -----Original Message----- > From: Maarten Wullink <maarten.wullink=40sidn...@dmarc.ietf.org> > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2024 9:59 PM > To: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] RESTful EPP draft next session how to move > forward > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > Hi All, > > During the next REGEXT session on Wednesday we will be asking the WG > where to best continue to work on RESTful EPP (REPP). > > There was broad support for this work during previous sessions and on the > mailing list and by other communities such as CENTR (centr.org > <http://secure- > web.cisco.com/1yR7AbWi_bLjoECIPto4bCW8jg5e4TpW2sOzLzzXVBZiEsJ- > NZ8_czhrKU3ysMaudfEkrNP62UW_DmQQ5TCmaF3dNFkcI7JL6e6vnGY8Zjgs > 3uXT3_R7nZJMCerzAR8KvZqoVH9K9PSDFsx8FElmyC41vl6hRiI4BwjCsBbxOI5 > GSGNRm- > 8JFVDPn82HPsKr25vRjdnzXeJlCDuIIyE5wtrJTfhqKiX711nhbtoa1fiS6mxB6TqZ > 0bEkDI0GPSRSnNG9Vr2NJ0EuRtSJVQmzkQwvDBUTv- > jJRupRMczoPPn4/http%3A%2F%2Fcentr.org%2F>) > But, some have also expressed the opinion that REPP is not an extension nor > transport protocol, but instead something new. > > The current draft is not fully compliant with RFC5730 ( e.g. statleless vs > stateful) but does have a goal of full compatibility with the existing object > mapping and extensions.
[SAH] I can't find an IETF draft that describes the topic. I did find this one, though: https://sidn.github.io/ietf-epp-restful-transport/draft-epp-restful-transport.html I'd very much prefer to base our working group discussions on a published IETF draft. Please publish one, or more, as necessary. > How to best fit formally fit this work into the IETF process? > We see 2 options: > > 1) WG to adopt this work? > - This is the preferred option > - Is it an extension (in a wider sense)? > - Work on WG re-charter in parallel (if required)? > > > 2) Create a new WG (NEXTGEN-EPP)? > - Focus on a next generation RESTful EPP? > - Cleaner and no distractions by work on EPP/RDAP extensions? > - But will be same people + more red tape [SAH] We really, really need to see a draft (or drafts) to have a meaningful discussion of this topic. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
