Hi Mario, > On 28 May 2024, at 09:23, Mario Loffredo <mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it> wrote: > > Hi, > here in the following some comments about this extension: > > 1) Don't know how to formally use this extension with HEAD as this method > doesn't return the body. > Hence, it would represent a case where the server returns an extension > without signaling it in the rdapConformance array.
I didn't put this into the draft, but my assumption was that clients would "remember" which servers supported the extension to improve performance on subsequent requests. > 3) Wonder how many servers don't include the registrar entity in the response > to a domain lookup. > The gTLD RDAP response profile requires servers to do that. > As a result, I'm afraid that this extension would be useless. This extension is not trying to compensate for missing information, but to reduce the "cost" (on both client and server side) of following a referral. G. -- Gavin Brown Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) https://www.icann.org _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
