We were thinking about requesting an additional side-meeting to discuss how to best proceed with RESTful EPP, because there is not much time during the regext meeting. But if there is an additional hour for regext, then this side-meeting may not be required.
- Maarten > Op 3 jun 2024, om 16:52 heeft Andrew Newton (andy) <a...@hxr.us> het volgende > geschreven: > > Given the interims that never materialized, the discussions on EPP over > REST/HTPP/QUIC, the drafts on IDNS that are expected, and the recent issues > on RDAP redaction, would it be wise to also ask for an additional 1 hour slot? > > -andy > > On 6/3/24 10:40, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool wrote: >> >> A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Antoin Verschuren, a >> Chair of the REGEXT Working Group. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> Working Group Name: Registration Protocols Extensions >> Area Name: Applications and Real-Time Area >> Session Requester: Antoin Verschuren >> >> >> Number of Sessions: 1 >> Length of Session(s): 2 Hours >> Number of Attendees: 50 >> Conflicts to Avoid: >> Chair conflict: dnsop dance saag sidrops savnet grow deleg >> Key participant conflict: dispatch secdispatch >> >> >> >> Participants who must be present: >> >> Resources Requested: >> >> Special Requests: >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
