Hi, I support the adoption.
I think this is the right group to work on this issue, however a close sync and thorough review by dnsop shall be assured.
One comment/question to the document: my understanding is that it presents a mix of existing and not yet existing or proposed new practices for handling of the issue. Chapter 5 is not specific in the respect which methods are existing and which are proposed. Only chapter 6 makes it more clear, at least for those methods proposed as best practice.
Also, are methods 5.2.2.4. and 5.2.2.5. already covered in the existing EPP specifications, or new extensions are required to cover them?
Kind Regards, Pawel On 29.01.24 16:17, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
This is the formal adoption request for Best Practices for Deletion of Domain
and Host Objects in the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-regext-epp-delete-bcp/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by
REGEXT and comment to this message on the list, clearly stating your view.
Andy Newton already volunteered to be a document shepherd this item will be
adopted.
This Call For Adoption will close on Monday 12 February.
If there are no objections, the chairs will consider this document adopted.
Thanks,
Your REGEXT co-chairs Jim and Antoin
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
