+1 On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 9:24 AM Gould, James <jgo...@verisign.com> wrote:
> Jim and Antoin, > > > > I support having an interim meeting to discuss. I see distinct problems > being solved by the three drafts draft-gould-regext-rdap-versioning, > draft-newton-regext-rdap-extensions, and > draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type. I highlight them below to prime the > discussion: > > > > 1. draft-newton-regext-rdap-extensions – Provide clarification of the > creation of RDAP extensions, where we can address much of the clarification > issues that we’ve struggled with on the mailing list. > 2. draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type – Provide an alternative > mechanism to the use of a query parameter that does not pose an issue with > RDAP redirection servers. > 3. draft-gould-regext-rdap-versioning – Provide support for an > extensible set of RDAP extension versioning types with Opaque Versioning > and Semantic Versioning initially defined that will work in unison with > draft-newton-regext-rdap-extensions and > draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type. > > > > Thanks for catching up on the thread and setting up an interim meeting. > > >
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
