Hello Pawel,

Good observations! Please find my comments below. (Andy, please add/subtract 
here if needed. :))

Thanks,
Jasdip

From: <kowa...@denic.de>
Date: Monday, November 27, 2023 at 11:51 AM
To: Jasdip Singh <jasd...@arin.net>, "regext-cha...@ietf.org" 
<regext-cha...@ietf.org>
Cc: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>, Andy Newton <a...@hxr.us>
Subject: Re: [regext] RDAP-X draft adoption

Hi Jasdip,

Do you mean by adopting RDAP-X draft the WG shall include the requirements of 
all the said drafts when it comes to extensions and versions signalling and 
negotiation, or only keep the current scope and define extension points so that 
the other drafts can be based on the same method?

[JS] The latter.

Some of those requirements, not yet covered by RDAP-X:

[JS] Right. For simplicity, not sure if RDAP-X should cover them.

- Versioning and JSContact have requirements included for signalling when 
certain extensions/versions start/end being available.

[JS] Not saying that such temporal signaling for extensions/versions does not 
have its usefulness but as a contrasting approach to JSContact, SimpleContact 
uses a “noJCard” extension through RDAP-X to signal the non-use of jCard in 
RDAP responses.

- Versioning introduces all the semantics of versions, which is not (yet) 
existing in the RDAP RFCs where I agree that if introduced shall base on the 
same concepts of content negotiation.

Kind Regards,

Pawel
Am 15.11.23 um 00:26 schrieb Jasdip Singh:
Hello Antoin, Jim,

Given the ongoing discussion on how to negotiate extensions between RDAP 
clients and servers (using HTTP headers versus query parameters), be it for 
SimpleContact [1], JSContact [2], or versioning in RDAP [3], Andy and I want to 
request a call for WG adoption of the RDAP-X draft [4]. We believe that the 
HTTP headers-based approach could help unify extensions negotiation across the 
RDAP ecosystem.

Thanks,
Jasdip & Andy

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-newton-regext-rdap-simple-contact/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-rdap-versioning/
[4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type/





_______________________________________________

regext mailing list

regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to