Thanks for this, Jack. After a quick glance, I noticed that you're using an
unusual method to define the extension. Can I suggest that you take a look
at RFC 3735 for guidance on the community-agreed upon methods for extending
EPP?

 

Here's one specific example: Section 6.1.4 of your draft describes the
<pre-registration-data> extension element. If you follow RFCs 3735 and 5730,
the <create> command should be extended like this:

 

   <epp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp-1.0">

        <command>

          <create>

            <!-- Domain creation data -->

            <domain:create>

              <!-- Domain details -->

            </domain:create>

            <!-- Pre-Registration Data -->

          </create>

          <extension>

            <prereg:pre-registration-data
xmlns:prereg="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:preregepp-1.0"

              xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:preregepp-1.0
preregepp-1.0.xsd" >

              <!-- Pre-registration information -->

            </prereg:pre-registration-data>

          </extension>

        </command>

      </epp>

 

Note the use of the <extension> element and the URNs for the extension
namespace and schema location. RFC 5910 might also be helpful as an example
of an extension that adds elements to the <create> command.

 

Scott

 

From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Jacques Latour
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 10:57 AM
To: regext@ietf.org
Cc: Don Slaunwhite <don.slaunwh...@cira.ca>; t...@internetnz.net.nz
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] I-D draft-latour-pre-registration

 


Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe. 

Hi all,

 

At the ICANN78 meeting and other venues, there were quite a lot of
discussion on AI/ML abuse detection related discussions and presentations.

*       Example:
https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/icann78/de/4%20%2020231023-TechDay-AI%
20at%20EURid.pdf
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1NTfB4xD-peu1wmsKjsb5oRjqKlgy79kO6R4MUaEAqGWLz
CXapc1ih75TFZ_PyYE3D0UA4cta4OM8FBX4snxQmkJym19OiUgg5FADk6Ex6hTFLf1FRGpFgR6KO
QNNqBpJYBr0lOpmqJ9P5AKc2rvh7DiKKcaavBq63t8deMI-DvSeAKA4z7a-vPmHlPDeizq1hG8Tz
L3XAyrpcAJdLE4MdHW3ZrQfD7NRFrdAqkXBo-Cwe-Ggw7kvjZvb_oR4NCeLTJPjWo29dqsUepxdI
xGpFBaUOKLgDplD65kWIyO6OKk/https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.sched.com%2Fhosted_files%2Fi
cann78%2Fde%2F4%2520%252020231023-TechDay-AI%2520at%2520EURid.pdf> 

 

But this is after the fact, after a registration is completed, so we thought
of a new extension to allow the registrar to ask the registry that have this
real time capabilities to analyse the pre-registration information and
return a quality score to better inform the process.

 

 
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1LcVfDIG2NmoEQu3NIqZW0YOU03IZwU5giqworrs5rgI6E
WXtlOPcK9COZjCim5-MWLmdKqoRofBnmHAfqH02D3yptntkti1Z65Pka7CDyp3Fwh2pjRkhfdvys
jdjF-NiUwYt0m5hhKYg1EWOpxrDqI1b7x7qg1u73NxghsZ3fmOSj9LksRPO7tMMJMk_OLCPXTVcZ
1w2gEqswshLzPVGYdazAT_ZxyCmEEDUeelP_3DQdF3OjRRr4FhvGubYQgBRsm7uvFSkJ1j9fv0-Q
kiB70t8uauhH9ptYQdcDfsJ1tI/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-
latour-pre-registration%2F> draft-latour-pre-registration-00 - EPP
Pre-Registration Verification (ietf.org)

 

Have a read,

 

Jack

 

CLASSIFICATION:CONFIDENTIAL

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to