Speaking as co-Chair and including the responses by Jim Gould and Andy Newton under separate cover in this thread, I would say these are excellent questions and they should be resolved by the working group as it considers how to move forward the functionality described in Section 4.
For the now, the question to the working group is whether or not conceptually the two functional elements should be separated. The details of what that looks like is the work that would be in the working group. Keep in mind that the x-media-type document is not yet a working group document. When that request comes in the working group will have to consider the question of how it relates to the signaling in jsContact and if it’s appropriate to “bring them together” or “keep them separate yet aligned” or something else entirely. This may influence your decision of whether or not to adopt the document when that question is asked. Jim co-Chair REGEXT On 13 Nov 2023, at 12:28, kowa...@denic.de wrote: > Hi James, > > Likely I missed this part about splitting in the meeting - sorry for that. > Can you be more specific? It is the mechanism described in 4. Transition > Considerations? Shall it be only referring to jscontact or contact > representation or to any transition of output representations? > > Here we also have draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-01 which would fulfil > the same purpose, wouldn't it? > > Kind Regards, > > Pawel > > > Am 13.11.23 um 16:53 schrieb James Galvin: >> Following up from last week’s REGEXT meeting, there was consensus in the >> room that the document: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-16/ >> >> Should be split into two documents: the signaling function and the extension. >> >> The signaling function draft would be put on the standards track and the >> extension draft would be put on the experimental track. >> >> With this message the Chairs are asking the broader working group to confirm >> this action. If you have questions or concerns please reply to this message >> by Monday, 20 November 2023. If you need more time please ask on the list >> and the Chairs will consider an extension. >> >> Although we had consensus in the meeting room, the Chairs would appreciate a >> “+1” reply if you agree with this action. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Antoin and Jim >> >> _______________________________________________ >> regext mailing list >> regext@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
