We also implemented the signal in section 5 of 
draft-gould-regext-rdap-versioning, using the "versioning" query parameter.  We 
intend to make draft-gould-regext-rdap-versioning more generic to support 
opaque versioning (use of extension identifier only) and semantic versioning 
(extension identifier with major and manor version numbers) with the three 
features of extension information in the help response, signaling the desired 
extensions in a query parameter or an HTTP header based on 
draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type, and extension information beyond that 
supplied in the rdapConformance in the RDAP responses.  

-- 

JG 



James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com 
<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgo...@verisign.com>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/> 




On 11/13/23, 12:29 PM, "regext on behalf of kowa...@denic.de 
<mailto:kowa...@denic.de>" <regext-boun...@ietf.org 
<mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of kowa...@denic.de 
<mailto:kowa...@denic.de>> wrote:


Hi James,


Likely I missed this part about splitting in the meeting - sorry for 
that. Can you be more specific? It is the mechanism described in 4. 
Transition Considerations? Shall it be only referring to jscontact or 
contact representation or to any transition of output representations?


Here we also have draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type-01 which would 
fulfil the same purpose, wouldn't it?


Kind Regards,


Pawel




Am 13.11.23 um 16:53 schrieb James Galvin:
> Following up from last week’s REGEXT meeting, there was consensus in the room 
> that the document:
>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/19J4Hdt8br6nY1uMmm4OX0PG_8xqcMHW4gsCzm8MPCaHVTYL-Yq7qAxm8cV64pX3HOgs1Gw-fMpc1KgzWcYlvslhpFHdVx6DeEwtQSYAUsvdmjR35SNJ1y92kNiviIl7-eIX2QyWJjNK5R_F7wFlv84ZG1r2TUnfbY_DVw6jc37LA596n58VlexGlZP82oqBlyNwRkQwzC0bgOfN9C-69ZX5la-CDxWR0XrlrY8CPQmH10Wv9nUTVeSy-IXHnJjrPTo9tYunZDAJsB8za62Pkg7Cng6dvjhFOqIEzDTbDeDk/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-16%2F
>  
> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/19J4Hdt8br6nY1uMmm4OX0PG_8xqcMHW4gsCzm8MPCaHVTYL-Yq7qAxm8cV64pX3HOgs1Gw-fMpc1KgzWcYlvslhpFHdVx6DeEwtQSYAUsvdmjR35SNJ1y92kNiviIl7-eIX2QyWJjNK5R_F7wFlv84ZG1r2TUnfbY_DVw6jc37LA596n58VlexGlZP82oqBlyNwRkQwzC0bgOfN9C-69ZX5la-CDxWR0XrlrY8CPQmH10Wv9nUTVeSy-IXHnJjrPTo9tYunZDAJsB8za62Pkg7Cng6dvjhFOqIEzDTbDeDk/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact-16%2F>
>
> Should be split into two documents: the signaling function and the extension.
>
> The signaling function draft would be put on the standards track and the 
> extension draft would be put on the experimental track.
>
> With this message the Chairs are asking the broader working group to confirm 
> this action. If you have questions or concerns please reply to this message 
> by Monday, 20 November 2023. If you need more time please ask on the list and 
> the Chairs will consider an extension.
>
> Although we had consensus in the meeting room, the Chairs would appreciate a 
> “+1” reply if you agree with this action.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antoin and Jim
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1pPSFq2VKaxybECYf_INsJKHN8J2hAiijwinhLvPwYL0lx-V9FprBVazcsqHa5wHEq0exmIodBCqB127SzjhErc0bZAsvuCfmDPbYc5R-5hTJ0Lp_VbrqX9pScApsRabhPE1tv2wtc9QOMjFOLDlgTi12mXooukGwhdQbJLVVYGuyGbO0oD6EaHBYTFfJHE8FH_W5oI4SjH2Fbgen50YCXrlwpggpjvy3-4uasJ36E9FyXVlgSJcP1a3BMWG30CnqiHFG51QKFn1qCbBHDD45b6Qr_blpxy58MZgeL9N8LwQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
>  
> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1pPSFq2VKaxybECYf_INsJKHN8J2hAiijwinhLvPwYL0lx-V9FprBVazcsqHa5wHEq0exmIodBCqB127SzjhErc0bZAsvuCfmDPbYc5R-5hTJ0Lp_VbrqX9pScApsRabhPE1tv2wtc9QOMjFOLDlgTi12mXooukGwhdQbJLVVYGuyGbO0oD6EaHBYTFfJHE8FH_W5oI4SjH2Fbgen50YCXrlwpggpjvy3-4uasJ36E9FyXVlgSJcP1a3BMWG30CnqiHFG51QKFn1qCbBHDD45b6Qr_blpxy58MZgeL9N8LwQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext>



_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to