Thanks for the review, Lars. Notes below...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2023 3:08 AM
> To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ope...@ietf.org; regext-cha...@ietf.org;
> regext@ietf.org; AlBanna, Zaid <zalba...@verisign.com>; AlBanna, Zaid
> <zalba...@verisign.com>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-
> openid-25: (with COMMENT)
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click 
> links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
> is safe.
>
> Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-25: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this 
> introductory
> paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://secure-
> web.cisco.com/12q4iamYo5UulSDBPFzWZOD3tmtSmN_bnVvofHt4zYNLnagQ
> 3qKEwv-kb4IlNRTSj22JBZooKhD_CdlmPXcsX93RRNbMKngz_Uck-
> 2Eb6xD0Xe6NW942qYlWcHpg72nMk4t13cQCGFrqVOEAeUnrqZkGoufM9hyIS
> hnqmNO_77n4dMbPhnOogqitjbJ8g2usUoNXyYu0GOO9VLcrC1pKIAWimLCnS
> 8YLewOSU-
> s6e2mkjsJyJkCco3IxES0K8suIFbvoj_XqE1Qpwbg8rnyqOty9ZzSzhlfNJDrbJk15
> MX9xY7UfvTpVbvehowTus-
> SRG/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fabout%2Fgroups%2Fiesg%2Fstatem
> ents%2Fhandling-ballot-positions%2F
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT
> positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1-
> 6L7mdh_i6ZPQgUz3XmTPbBnfrHLMYYbguZNvkioebTTSVjX_Y0xIaSW_KmQdA
> lT44OotsvPcw7ARJ0y3svPoi02c_DyQMVM0aT19RpTJCnkkFOQcNB6SqKVc0JIy
> 5IcOfChrCFknSxVlzhPd1TsZIWj3FQ2tPn2gxrfoW0Yog4mu7ay5_tdkqb4LUQ7oi
> TQEBhRf0guUNC-sSvAkGlMUwqXjNUXJ6kwpexCw-
> DCypMqxT5BXcEbTYW2VSjlbFKVRqSXyqVFQAd-
> JuH5fsJdOfLJsq7hWbTZCvXp48W1LIz7U2zsDOcOU5wxTVJ3_58e/https%3A%
> 2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid%2F
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> # GEN AD review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-25
>
> CC @larseggert
>
> Thanks to Meral Shirazipour for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> review
> (https://secure-
> web.cisco.com/1sxtsJUBaW67HuuSRNxGXb9YdjRMt2qOT0VGMxl3a61p-
> 8ktpRfvOdL65w-
> vkxXI1wgInedrpIbKudx5wD2b1znhf9yZMVE1dABgUoHYL7xXywtm9R7LTibICZ
> xuTKzZ3OQz_fdJLCJjDHFLwkv29l-
> aQquKR7J1VkCU22uN0_5AV6TnoXfY9z5nmnkn7mmfbyrx9baFmS88GNalCps
> qRyhXp278C8PIIX-
> xVlUW6XaVzQZsnaeCTq5qRUyaf_jXfBRa3Qr6jAuv4r4HRWPtsbivHNCdIIRpM
> BZmDOARE3RiuWtitOFuXqAOkqznVo1IC/https%3A%2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.o
> rg%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fgen-art%2FmS2UefXapDTAjcRYHkcT0-sP7WY).
>
> ## Comments
>
> ### Section 1.2, paragraph 0
> ```
>   1.2.  Proposal
> ```
> Should this section be re-titled now this is being published as an RFC?

[SAH] Perhaps. "Approach" could also work.

> ### Inclusive language
>
> Found terminology that should be reviewed for inclusivity; see
> https://secure-
> web.cisco.com/1bhpLtafxmIVE415rxQig3A9LH1atAWZCqUYFb6YyHRxIn_5gt1
> O_eJonXXO-
> Ldhrdxtk58KxG6PsZi6sO3eG1EAxaBOI3_pvUz8GH0s6h54I7O2q7KF8Pefmx3Iz
> FpWL_I4Z-tgz-
> 5XAUs92FrWhobK3eOjKojgwAtMMkWWWZrEcKDLkrap7KtvN1NF3zZdq9NA
> W_wceXI_qPivUXrx_6CgXZTeTUs0hHhig-
> _vW0E0g1qO5k23jsTk5gTvuJTmFTfzWF42KefZ8Weg2QFnLLjWAXFFOEuaie6_i
> _hi5-6t-Mlru4JfPmnuUEDa6EKJT/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-
> editor.org%2Fpart2%2F%23inclusive_language for background and more
> guidance:
>
>  * Term `traditional`; alternatives might be `classic`, `classical`, 
> `common`,
>    `conventional`, `customary`, `fixed`, `habitual`, `historic`,
>    `long-established`, `popular`, `prescribed`, `regular`, `rooted`,
>    `time-honored`, `universal`, `widely used`, `widespread`

[SAH] "Conventional" would work.

>  * Term `native`; alternatives might be `built-in`, `fundamental`, 
> `ingrained`,
>    `intrinsic`, `original`

[SAH] "built-in" would work.

> ## Nits
>
> All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may
> choose to
> address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
> automated tools (via https://secure-
> web.cisco.com/1Ll1OGN59i2wQL9eYUrl4gSUrIIUryONvM8OPMHapjenWKKZ
> h7DCwWdSGr4HFKU9gfmMNFzemDbNniIxi2nK9VQv1cch5XCaooARqAOnTyC
> r_uonmPGfHlpgWXCPZpG6Sdwk1KL3DesD-
> kZ3w3ffvTyIkQ4G9sohB9zTGrEe3WWpEWxLvHtK1nxeQbvto9lDNHpIE1qzSisY
> rbc-ftwFo7eYjWxYBV8jd22YSyMJ2HLFasV9z95UvCQFnnOIH_psJD0Rud18-
> DfE04We0F-
> XWW_drVGNd9X6ld2FNQBhiKOn1Ny1Sj49fX9y9zH8dSghE/https%3A%2F%2F
> github.com%2Flarseggert%2Fietf-reviewtool), so there
> will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what 
> you
> did with these suggestions.
>
> ### URLs
>
> These URLs in the document did not return content:
>
>  * https://secure-web.cisco.com/1cF0so15FMe6ipnXdNAlKaDhIc5CYwm-
> boXvqnvvgdWI0kva_do-0XoPINSYE4uFu3hWftI8CVf-
> FLte9hG7sqPFHS55sUy7HBQllw5SFhDM33MeZlx9LN8a-Q01hocwkpIgm-
> F8BW6gN85P1U_TxlzjAz9iTB1sBUERFCw9niHCzht11XTQTaFtBjp4bMun2FVQs
> WVVodgcnue_YoU2AXBA62kkbyyD4lGHZR8M6H4kGB3HLVhPW3Np0yMeW-
> emXf_LIWxfTCxuNXPnKWJszstV04EX0OIRcZMH_oL9SGrWjeKqPBmo_zhOAT
> T5tSq6o/https%3A%2F%2Ftestprovider.rdap.verisignlabs.com%2F
>  * https://secure-
> web.cisco.com/1KEjMpYtCsAGZ9cO2UmEKkUFY26HD87jXJWxL3g7GokaiSTq5
> z5zdnsLEFFVHwCjsqDCkQx-
> OH1MR05Gv2rNhk_c9lYdzqwDh0MwdomMd6c2RTLywSk_MZ7FkYskESuxP_y
> XPbFZksETIfitHSEq7Py0IbDhXg05stJVwJBm6Kmj77qmRaEYTCs1HonJImNYr3l1
> 9VjQ8tG6SfbQBRJSWTfHH3VvEOLkpc6xzbLWNCBAu-
> 70oWmKp8bHO3ZxoMWFnyymOhzZ8eIBa9qYZYNpUXral9RdiBmDeaGgaaVU
> BLMhkqLWj2ZZ8OI4rS9hIlW0V/https%3A%2F%2Fauth.viagenie.ca
>  * https://secure-
> web.cisco.com/1xZrt4b2ts194lHnEwScJgLRoUg0Y6cjALrX75Y1w9BlDUcOdDLw
> AbxOqa1lC5xgfpq9dOdGcGEzXzsWMP2gP9NU-
> 5OwMy2NVeSI4EuozDhqIVltDNfE4PM2g_9gxJ_w6qaEWmjzR8YrHQ5dKaEclJ
> UIK2o7iWh2wtWNJ3UnNEo39aXfE_we-
> YU2AZHw00AP68XJfDabWK0rKCCsqbXpQzpI0yJUs9Ln7y9RnQGAuHcS2yfLjB
> W3GOY5HgMUjZDSHac0bxvzX8pegCkyTfXkw78fT5s_enxywfAxgsvtEC1TljE37
> GY4jzhllg23CoH17/https%3A%2F%2Frdap.verisignlabs.com%2F

[SAH] These are all associated with implementation experiments that have been 
shut down. The lack of content is expected.

> These URLs in the document can probably be converted to HTTPS:
>
>  * http://secure-
> web.cisco.com/1pQf21U6PeIzFytwHIDmMAeoyAmLX17ocXwtzBhsCIDhNe9F
> BTFld_p0RresD_lUfU8dNsKNhPWp2i6zlZ6weiogzL1412a4fXvTsOWoVZUxlD2V
> Rc2G33q_5E4A26zzHuO43ll1QOfDbC0sXYvjG6v9GHmikxFh8PraHY1wMozFNF
> nu3dxyjV4xT312kSA0myTCcOiSBmPszwYhU0Rl9kV9lv37-
> OX7OrxDlho7Mz3kU2MK7q1SGjgWqHxqIQk6D8GAuMwLQLTEKgiyKqWlLi9fw
> Ip-
> uFaAL5eDqo5dshYkWQyyRRodMadGl8yGiErCx/http%3A%2F%2Fopenid.net
> %2Fspecs%2Fopenid-connect-discovery-1_0.html
>  * http://secure-web.cisco.com/1q9A97y8b3t9fRpRLr8rLvEQa3-
> WmZP8VJhTlt5OXzCIfwamn3sDetB1UQyRfchjksERdvoCl_vX9U4AnRiP2corW-
> qDpDo85cjvOGY85Pmyaq1mkQUXZP3Zt9kdemCnhHTd7dlSa96mG8xJdDju6rE
> beBn3iF7Al2bXrRbj9F-
> 69Zwk2sZf4SIEUECNOQg1ZQQaz2FZ5lHILAyiMAoKw5UlQ7-
> smCX8oblNP9wJzKCnK3J63qHhn0KrHp1cTgREL0DnmMIHr0eh7Tl-
> 7LXU5xaLLqVy5uhvr2v4Azhmzatn0wv_QN3_R4cz_C6JX4GYv/http%3A%2F%2
> Fopenid.net%2Fspecs%2Fopenid-connect-registration-1_0.html
>  * http://secure-web.cisco.com/12JXxy-
> bJEics8BbYLUl88Lx4HQpxfUXnKmuGEl2VzWKn6azgwdCJIqh8uZ_ZDZ_4LANcx
> ZYMRYgY6mIrJebjEjPMB89Lqlb8PentaTR4eah-_sskhqSn2-iX45Y_TS-
> Rjt8c2IspLC-
> gx3CxJ3VnjpU8usqW1TImvmgr4T6AqzJwlWtjbq0EH1amQo6YeIa4SxSQgAouX
> -
> 8T8NPFXXyQ6O28R3DHWq_x6g7994XJjeebfuGjEq3Tes84ByKTAgFDL15N4N4
> wAfPSQs9Wcvd5h9v4U-
> _qx9nII9bOE_rdqSRv3xHhW7TkydM6DmXBDw8n/http%3A%2F%2Fcurl.haxx.
> se%2F
>  * http://secure-
> web.cisco.com/1xdMLzQ9qZnkf7SJYGDTabYtlSev8BcR9xVlyUXDrDyBiEGzY43-
> i47-HOFsGJhYIdpiEH79bJgPLslVYYu1fjcmdhiatAx0G5BFbIO9Wk8QamR-Yo-
> pGJITBXzIGZ2NBlkx_sKreeq7hvZ0oKgRiNpkrAkQj8nmuxk-
> J6LyHZtnzweHWKFipKB1nPruSH2YAkrZE8mlzXsqNAkkveT4Jt_dheYnQSR7WB
> wF1VgVig3u9hgyYKZefkPlqfeNdmsb-m4D-
> mNz9Q9c6JSidD0_qFMRUSmFzyQMxdNnVVLyYid-
> OD2DSuWcVBWON3AHIZcBb/http%3A%2F%2Fopenid.net%2Fconnect%2F
>  * http://secure-
> web.cisco.com/1ijCYB00C6mUOfvAoMycF9kN5UHf8aqG0hoAl9HlV-
> UgyDoOVwoVr-
> H0MPQoK8L8OWZvv4seiAyO4HnrrNCiexnQdL4JTE4qfTmGTSivSNXbcKUfhaLo
> Moh40ISa07AuhkXFOYwEPp3Vsp0Beyk2TZOn9OJViK-
> hJRZudHaPDoELoMHg4S2Qd26iBorXGLvZ5nzfkIxNc0735mWwGfTM_ItRbkYw
> hiav9GIXvOAFZHB2D7iHWNls1hK__1FlazjE2r2PowpJaBJXmdxRDrM8lF46SbAh
> DLQC47RqWkVJn6alNkci4PTzwmXq9RiPGhUPf/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.verisig
> nlabs.com%2F
>  * http://secure-web.cisco.com/1g78Lu4cGZpEgfGCn6lLmjwTYtgF-
> YdALJVyaz21EhpLEpOEEDOyi6ar6iPIsjlnYU2so5VWdoAE96HH4Qmhd8TZXsCn
> 9DQ7VxSbuQ8gHuyA6VHg0MKf5XSEwJUT6vgYaHBWpUREmMdeDHo5nkR4Ei
> PCF2E3H_YIUS9lba7W9Mvv0NNq4sXLpEMMT8FDrsAfKyOt1wI4NdcwZ9KCoQ
> Y7xvIztP_UgnBPhE5TBojLqM45YSTf-
> 7NFMJzw2P_VNYiwcpX69FdZWmNqe5Z4CzlXW0kP9Yk1k3ZKP0Mt3qhzLC_zx
> Uc7mPHbXzGOhDs_d4V2P/http%3A%2F%2Fopenid.net%2Fspecs%2Fopenid
> -connect-core-1_0.html

[SAH] I'll check them all.

> ### Grammar/style
>
> #### Section 5.3, paragraph 5
> ```
> ely, an RDAP server MAY attempt to logout from the OP using the "OpenID
> Conn
>                                    ^^^^^^
> ```
> Did you mean the verb "log out" instead of the noun "logout"?

[SAH] Yes, will change.

> #### Section 6.1, paragraph 1
> ```
> sues, DNS resolution failures, and web site functional issues. -----END 
> FORM-
>                                    ^^^^^^^^
> ```
> Nowadays, it's more common to write this as one word.

[SAH] "web site" -> "website". Will fix.

> #### Section 6.4, paragraph 1
> ```
> f use cases around informing the general public. -----END FORM----- 10. 
> Imple
>                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ```
> Consider using only "public" to avoid wordiness.

[SAH] Will fix.

> #### Section 9.3, paragraph 4
> ```
> te for a fully authorized client. Currently supported identity providers 
> incl
>                                   ^^^^^^^^^
> ```
> A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb "Currently".

[SAH] I can strike "currently".

Scott
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to