I've reviewed just the JWT claims registration requests and don't have any objection to the registration of "rdap_allowed_purposes" and "rdap_dnt_allowed" being made. I am not in a position to review the entire document so my reply here is limited in scope to only the claims registration.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 8:59 PM David Dong via RT < drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> wrote: > Dear John, Brian, and Michael (cc: regext WG), > > As the designated experts for the JSON Web Token Claims registry, can you > review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-24 for > us? Please see: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid/ > > The due date is September 12th. > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll > make the registration at: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/jwt/ > > We will assume that your response is a consensus response, unless you tell > us otherwise. > > With thanks, > > David Dong > IANA Services Sr. Specialist > -- _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
