> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Newton <a...@hxr.us> > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 10:18 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com> > Cc: regext@ietf.org; dn...@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DNSOP] FW: New Version Notification for draft- > hollenbeck-regext-epp-delete-bcp-00.txt > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > Hi Scott, > > Thanks for putting this together. > > In section 7.1 of your draft there is mention of a special "sacrificial.arpa" > to > basically park these delegations to something that cannot be hijacked. > > Instead of creating sacrificial.arpa, could sacrificial.invalid from the > invalid TLD > as defined by RFC 6761 be used? This would avoid the mechanics of getting > sacrificial.arpa blessed plus it has the benefits that DNS SHOULD immediately > respond with nxdomain.
[SAH] Sure, that's worth talking about. As you noted, there might be less friction compared to some of the alternatives. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
