Hi,
Am 26.01.23 um 20:33 schrieb Jasdip Singh:
[SAH] Thanks for the feedback, Mario. I still don't think this is a good idea,
but if mine is a minority opinion I'll update the text to remove the MUST and
include config info so a server can describe the type(s) of clients it
supports. Please folks, share an opinion now if you have one. Should a server
be able to support one type of client only?
[JS] As much as we want to be liberal in accepting various usage scenarios from
clients, I think there is a merit in considering the implementation cost for
RDAP servers. Tend to agree with Mario and Julien; allowing a server to signal
the type of clients it supports should help speed up the server implementations
for this proposal.
[PK] I would also support Mario's proposal. There is a vast value in
faster adoption by the RDAP server implementers. If there will be a
strong use-case for one kind of client or another the servers would
adapt to the needs of the clients no doubt.
Kind Regards,
Pawel
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
