> -----Original Message----- > From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Mario Loffredo > Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 11:33 AM > To: Gould, James <jgo...@verisign.com>; regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] RDAP queries based on redacted properties > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > Hi James, > > this is the post following up my last reply about the JSContact "uid" in RDAP. > > In my opinion, rdap-redacted should address the relationship between the > RDAP queries and the redacted properties. > > In particular, to prevent from inconsistencies and redacted data breaches, the > document should state that RDAP queries MUST be allowed only to those users > that can access the unredacted values of the response fields the queries are > based upon.
[SAH] I don't understand this, Mario. If the user has access to the unredacted values of the response fields (meaning they're authorized to receive that data, correct?), why would they receive a redacted response? Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
