Dear Scott, Many thanks for your nitpicking! I've addressed your concern about Section 6 using your words, many thanks!
As for the namespace version, as James wrote before, we are going to update it after the WGLC. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 5:15 PM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck= 40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > > *From:* regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Antoin Verschuren > *Sent:* Monday, December 20, 2021 8:55 AM > *To:* regext@ietf.org > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: > draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-04 > > > > *Caution:* This email originated from outside the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know > the content is safe. > > Dear WG, > > > > This WGLC will end tonight, and so far we only have 2 explicit voices of > support. > > This is a bit low to declare consensus. Could more people voice their > support? > > Scott, can you confirm that the changes in version 05 address your initial > concerns? > > *[SAH] Not yet fixed completely:* > > > > *Section 6 still doesn’t explain why “Registries SHOULD validate the > domain names syntax in the provided email addresses”. I suggested this text > in an earlier note:* > > > > *"Registries SHOULD ensure that the provided email addresses are > syntactically valid to reduce the risk of future usability errors."* > > > > *The IANA Considerations section still uses “eai-0.3”. It should be > “eai-1.0”.* > > > > *Scott* > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > -- SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
