On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 08:10:02AM -0800, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 1:37 PM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > DISCUSS: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > There are two errata reports against RFC 7484, both in status > > "reported" > > (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7484&rec_status=15). > > Part of the requirements for advancing a document to Internet Standard > > is to address all errata reports against the original document. On a > > superficial reading of the diff from RFC 7484 to this document it does > > appear that changes are included that would address these two errata > > reports, but that should probably be acknowledged in the text, and the > > responsible AD should use the RFC Editor's errata tool to process the > > reports accordingly. > > > > The errata have been marked as "Verified".
Thanks! I saw the email for that and updated my ballot position during the telechat. -Ben _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
