Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Thanks for this document. I found it hard to understand what is actually being transferred in the title/abstract. Perhaps this could be expanded a little to help readers who are not familiar with EPP. I don't feel particularly strongly on this point, but when reviewing this document, I was wondering whether this document wouldn't be better published as informational rather than stds track, given that it seems to describe an operational practice of how an existing protocol (EPP) should be used. Regards, Rob _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
