Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In the third paragraph of (5.3) there is a roundabout way of saying how the registry responds to a valid info request by saying that it MUST NOT send no authorization value, or a non-empty authorization value. It would be more straightforward to say something like "the registry MUST respond to a valid info request by the non-sponsoring registrar with an empty authorization value". _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
