On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 8:10 AM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com> wrote:
> [SAH] I'm going to blame that on one of the WEIRDS co-chairs ;) who > reviewed 7482. > They really were a pair of slackers, weren't they? I agree that it might help to add some more text to explain the rationale > for the SHOULD. I don't recall why we used SHOULD here, other than noting > that there may be some other response code that might be more appropriate > based on a server's policy settings. A server that doesn't support search > at all, for example, might instead return a 405 response code. Hmm, might > this be an appropriate explanation right here? > That works for me! -MSK
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
