> -----Original Message----- > From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 9:11 AM > To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482...@ietf.org; regext-cha...@ietf.org; > regext@ietf.org; Mario Loffredo <mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it>; > mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf- > regext-rfc7482bis-02: (with COMMENT) > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content > is safe. > > Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.)
[SAH] [snip] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Section 1: > "Servers MUST return an > HTTP 501 (Not Implemented) [RFC7231] response to inform clients of > unsupported query types." > > I don't really like when already in the introduction one leaps into normative > statements. Doesn't this statement more belong in either Query processing > or extensibility? [SAH] Probably, but this is something inherited from 7482. I'm thus inclined to leave it there. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
