Of course, yes, 8174. My fingers had a light bout of dylsexia, so it seesm.
b On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:42 AM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> > > Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 4:25 PM > > To: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis....@ietf.org > > Cc: regext <regext@ietf.org> > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] AD review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis-02 > > > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not > click links > > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content > > is safe. > > > > Hi, all. This is ready to go into last call, and I'll do that as soon > as I'm done > > reviewing 7483bis. Only one comment (and it applies to both documents) > is > > that you should please use the new BCP 14 boilerplate and add a normative > > reference to RFC 8147. > > Ack, and thanks. You do mean 8174, right? > > Scott >
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
