> -----Original Message----- > From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 9:39 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Internationalized Email Addresses and EPP
[snip] > > I just wanted to say that if a registrar cannot handle the > > internationalised email of new customer it will lose new customers and > > this situation force it to fix its EPP. > > So then why should a registry force anything? We are back at the fact that > registrars wanting to support that scenario will indeed need to put > resources > for it, and hence if there is an EPP extension to support that they will > implement it. > The question is how to do it in a smart way to not disrupt all other > registrars > NOT wanting to support this scenario. This is a very important point. It's not just about how much work it takes the registry operator to do something, we also have to think about client impact. A change to the core protocol affects all clients and servers, whereas an extension affects only those clients and servers that choose to implement and support it. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
