Hi folks, thinking about the document again, I have another feedback.
The document does not contain any requirement or recommendation about when returning ldhName and unicodeName values. However, the examples seem to convey the idea that ldhName must always be returned and unicodeName must be returned in case of an IDN.
Is it worth writing something more about this topic? Best, Mario -------- Messaggio Inoltrato -------- Oggetto: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis Data: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:49:18 +0200 Mittente: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it> A: Antoin Verschuren <i...@antoin.nl>, regext@ietf.org +1 Mario Il 18/09/2020 15:52, Antoin Verschuren ha scritto:
The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis/ This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 2 October 2020. Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple “+1” is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this document by replying to this message on the list. The document shepherd for this document is Jasdip Singh. Regards, Jim and Antoin _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
-- Dr. Mario Loffredo Systems and Technological Development Unit Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT) National Research Council (CNR) via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy Phone: +39.0503153497 Mobile: +39.3462122240 Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
