Upon review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis, I have the following feedback:

Use of entity lookup for registrar objects was added, but there is no guidance 
related to handling entity lookups for different independent object types, 
where the object identifier and subsequently the <handle> may overlap.  An 
example is the ROID format for contacts “((\w|_){1,80}-\w{1,8}” is unique from 
the use of the IANA Registrar ID “\d+” for registrars but not unique from the 
registrar name (“fn element” in RFC 7483 with “\w+”).  The registrar name is a 
superset of the ROID, so a <handle> following the ROID format can take 
precedence as a contact object lookup instead of a registrar object lookup.  A 
<handle> is a unique for all RDAP objects except for the entity object that can 
be mapped to multiple distinct object types (contact and registrar).  Should 
the RFC cover the case of possible overlapping <handle> values for different 
types of entity objects, such as contact and registrar objects, where the 
server must define a unique <handle> scheme or define a <handle> precedence 
order?

-- 
 
JG



James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com 
<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgo...@verisign.com>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/>

On 9/18/20, 9:53 AM, "regext on behalf of Antoin Verschuren" 
<regext-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of i...@antoin.nl> wrote:

    The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission 
to the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
    
    
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ac_zElJ5XQmeb9wriRMGDiyT7UDPT8R5g2FcJC2RaWdbjhJcHcMnYwMXRBnrYllgQcTJVcEgIqtPvkcTXRxOQgngF10AWz1u6mbrsU9Obl8HdB5bEVPFRkQ1JKS_qyIlCvLAC98Tcml3B1kfNqMiHyspmwKyJ008MmX9avaDxOYfAqeKp0H1PXsGpYdjCZqjNa7zRWyk1N3_lUE1X2Yi9rXxJJ9Fanu4psdzydQ4_-UkpC-IPlaMBxw1hZIP6ui58hPmQk8mwL8Nf-kwlRrUVQ/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis%2F
    
    This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 2 October 2020.
    
    Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple “+1” is 
sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this document by replying to 
this message on the list.
    
    The document shepherd for this document is Mario Loffredo.
    
    Regards,
    
    Jim and Antoin
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    regext mailing list
    regext@ietf.org
    
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1337bMS3R-xYDaKpOLmuqHkKg7WPZZbyrQeuCHEOaMTy79XTBPSksvcitVG4qB9Y_ZjJhfUiOugbe1-v-9wXelNfsHhGGvWVcoMOwHlM_U5v6kzj7P5uT0Ng62WkQxlHJgKcnmBWSUqjGxf0Z9qloV1JU7QAzsGjezePhbG7PDDMJR1hrpzqfIqJxj0iUSyTfqPbhAhoUrpSG9N5jUHcAFCtXJKqsYpG8qWLvM9oBiD7M9TmVIaelV91RBcnl3JyEfx4gRw2MzBbYHHUgsY257fKpHu_IWgSP78kNIypzLJU/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext
    

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to