On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 5:42 AM Mario Loffredo <mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it> wrote:
> Hi Erik, > > thanks a lot for your review. Plase find my comments inline. > > Il 05/09/2020 23:22, Erik Kline via Datatracker ha scritto: > > Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-13: Discuss > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > DISCUSS: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Probably I'm just not properly aware of details in the referenced RFCs, > but > > I had a few questions that came to mind. > > > > [ section 2 ] > > > > * How are multiple keys encoded in a fieldSet parameter value? An > example > > would be welcome. > [ML] In my opinion this case is considered among the unsupported > fieldSet values producing a Bad Request response code as stated in > section 5. > > > > * What should be done with a query containing an empty fieldSet? > > E.g. ...?...&foo=bar&fieldSet=&baaz=quux > [ML} This case is considered in section 5 too. > Ah, yes, thank you. > > [ section 2.1 ] > > > > * How much data transfer is actually saved if servers are supposed to > send > > these subsetting_metadata structures in every response? Are we just > > swapping data bytes transferred for meta-data bytes transfered? > > [ML] Not all the responses. Just the responses to search queries which > are those returning an array of results. > Ah, I see, yes a more awake and attentive reading of: Therefore, servers implementing the query parameter described in this specification SHOULD provide additional information in their responses about the available field sets. makes sense. Thank you. That clears it all up for me. In general, in those responses, the payload due to the metadata > information is considerably lower than the payload due to the array of > results. > > It wouldn't make sense to provide the subsetting_metadata object as part > of a lookup response just because, in this case, the sizes of metadata > and relevant information would be comparable. > > > Best, > > Mario > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Dr. Mario Loffredo > Systems and Technological Development Unit > Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT) > National Research Council (CNR) > via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy > Phone: +39.0503153497 > Mobile: +39.3462122240 > Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo > >
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
