In preparation for the request for WGLC, draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces was updated with the following changes. The draft is now ready for WGLC.
1. Filled in the acknowledgements section. 2. Changed the reference from RFC 5730 to RFC 5731 for the transfer example in section 3.1 "Unhandled Object-Level" Extension. 3. Updated the XML namespace to urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:unhandled-namespaces-1.0, which removed bcp from the namespace and bumped the version from 0.1 and 1.0. Inclusion of bcp in the XML namespace was discussed at the REGEXT interim meeting. -- JG James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com <applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgo...@verisign.com> 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/> On 7/31/20, 10:57 AM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote: A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-02.txt has been successfully submitted by James Gould and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces Revision: 02 Title: Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Unhandled Namespaces Document date: 2020-07-31 Group: regext Pages: 20 URL: https://secure-web.cisco.com/1mCB13Apsy9q4w4T51vZrX5jt41UJD1IqGZKvemRR2pe9OWeA30ykWKjhv1c6sbx_3PI1acnYr4cmsw8tOxs-SSaNhnVO3D-9o8NcTi3bTRAATlZqsK9mTtOuRrGSfM0Laah_pC4s3lbJ8G0eD_3QprU4-iwU4dIPxh6_UD0nAIwFUUfhV4vfX6-dXcFpRwm8iYRgFSqRyaLcBq3zO8OdxGqB9y8oGH3k-UhgJaUDTK4uwHExA2uvZTXGCqtgUPtuL0yaeS-saHf0GjtQlYBevJkL6LbNxvJh0OBoLromtFw/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Finternet-drafts%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-02.txt Status: https://secure-web.cisco.com/1zhTedKy5QzaQuwHc55dIPSEUZ14tiVwLNhQRZzbleb9sAgMju5EwzO7ghGjbI6mr5bc2hvF3ZzqbX5vsE6YDKLChO1Zh3FtOTzjisfulaaHfvEW86n_ch_DcnduvGwKsD83IgGmfRo9AkYUA8QINEzd2zfHcyZ6HO7G37Rnx7mHWap_vl1bwo8JLUHYWa3Thp7r8WfDfMDfAqEVArQ8cE2o503lxZXPXBv6Of86NSitRC_uDvCafjsZPlAyq0isEg6DzgB2lMCtO-P8nJ1ia3w/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces%2F Htmlized: https://secure-web.cisco.com/1sZyIW2KieJ9Dj_KNZkydFFTZ1LdeqZRoAc6dbhrZPYpMjQJu-sYYbrcHU5dTiOVoNWPa4-sk3z0WN-ylZym3FflorBkEwy--tKsqbbx0Fqy05Fxrw1UCTc-1jbLJVgoVmGZG8DLyON00Jr8L49Xfh2Hx-MgztbQmyaW0OXo_I86XYqL669MuoLp9mEGBvpAR7d4n0mf3sBL0zdo1uNKPLyjEjFY3SopqM7e86RNVyG2ydgSFEhGEv9niZLcze6epyHydV_XC0jKItpCq7XgpWw/https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-02 Htmlized: https://secure-web.cisco.com/1YRP1Qj5NJgEWDzHjKJERAjJWiftcpdCDhNaovAj0M7ytTnZzMCU6aNAtdzJo9vgdxEtLLw8Gtd5lhUHzv0NHGczim1lK4uEmrEB9yo5znoT1d7n0ADZ1XDrXyrUyqLprWDu1M6fOXZPfSaSSYQbuSBMYsHhjGPrujHvtxRlyalFnSbon9nuMI7lKtmwh2mqZLBTgLKb7PZHBMmtdH87UgMRX8ivmiLUcs6HKx8Ay7gioGBB-oCayG-eu0zGtlcGsvvBTygGnUhrILyIxC_LbRg/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces Diff: https://secure-web.cisco.com/1B9VPlTl-67FWS-VJqQfHYSWoudR-cYOFaDyFs5ybFqMdIu0x0729pgipuS9s7H7RR2zNpTUCSqmJf3pQ3AVEhFAO8Anaqdc-BrtStLtC7viDhs0So5QvFUXtTds__CpXEDpNGE2Q6toFz0-XsdgNtmwzqmPsSmzOdSaY1qxPZuGKb0KZYSqBYt-KgkFepvnbNMtrOhn81-NrvAful-kthyxF3saK5feOA2NAl4e9YqF9wa-zL1cOkcCOOY8UGUajNRXfzbow2WJHpmRMEBsnxwpRl4tcubcdrTwNZEX41jk/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Frfcdiff%3Furl2%3Ddraft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-02 Abstract: The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP), as defined in RFC 5730, includes a method for the client and server to determine the objects to be managed during a session and the object extensions to be used during a session. The services are identified using namespace URIs. How should the server handle service data that needs to be returned in the response when the client does not support the required service namespace URI, which is referred to as an unhandled namespace? An unhandled namespace is a significant issue for the processing of RFC 5730 poll messages, since poll messages are inserted by the server prior to knowing the supported client services, and the client needs to be capable of processing all poll messages. This document defines an operational practice that enables the server to return information associated with unhandled namespace URIs that is compliant with the negotiated services defined in RFC 5730. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext