Thanks for the reminder and the review, Joe.  I will make sure your
comments are addressed before the document moves forward.

Barry

On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 11:47 AM Joe Clarke via Datatracker <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Reviewer: Joe Clarke
> Review result: Has Issues
>
> I didn't see any of my comments addressed in the text nor do I recall
> seeing a
> reply to my previous review.  I;m copying my previous review here.
>
> I have been assigned to review this document on behalf of the Ops Area
> Directorate.  This document augments the work set forth in
> I-D.ietf-regext-data-escrow to specify the objects that can be used in
> Domain
> Name Registration Data escrow deposits.  What I found most useful in this
> document is the incremental examples of the objects with the full XML and
> CSV
> deposit (and diff deposit) examples at the bottom.  In general, the fields
> in
> the object models were well specified and coupled with the examples, it
> helped
> to piece together the product one might need to produce.
>
> That said, I went back and forth between "Has Nits" and "Has Issues".  One
> thing that would really help this document is a full terminology/glossary
> section that includes expansions of abbreviations like RDE, EPP, NNDN,
> etc.
> Some abbreviations like TLD, CSV, and IDN are expanded, but this is very
> much
> required for all and throughout with very common ones done so in the
> terminology section.
>
> Next, in Section 4.4, you talk about CSV file checksums.  First, you
> reference
> ISO-3309 (HDLC?) but there is no actual reference like there is with
> ISO-3166-1.  But why use crc32 for a file checksum?  Why reference HDLC as
> the
> model?  I would think a SHA-2 checksum would be better for an actual file
> to
> ensure it has not been tampered with.
>
> When you talk about file compression for CSV (Section 4.6.2.1), you mention
> compression may use zip or gzip.  There is no normative language here, and
> I
> can imagine escrow holders would need to know the allowed values.  If I
> use xz
> will that be allowed?  Will the consumer know how to decompress that?
> What is
> "zip" and "gzip" exactly and how should they be handled?  My advice is some
> normative text here explaining the supported or allowed formats and by what
> standard those are defined.
>
> Finally, as a nit, I noticed two instances of IPv6 address
> 1080:0:0:0:8:800:200C:417A when showing XML model examples.  In the CSV
> examples you use an address from the doc range.  Did you mean to do so
> here as
> well?
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to