> -----Original Message----- > From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Stephane > Bortzmeyer > Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 9:07 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] [RDAP] rdapConformance mandatory? > > I've found a RDAP client which crashes, apparently when there is no > rdapConformance in the answer. > > RFC 7483 seems very liberal. It does not say that rdapConformance is > mandatory. > > Any opinion, backed by chapter and verse of RFC 7483, about wether this > member is really necessary?
Remember that we're working on 7483bis precisely because of issues like this. 7483 doesn't explicitly say that the structure is REQUIRED, but in my opinion it needs to be there so that clients know what to expect in terms of response data structures. 7483bis says this: "This data structure MUST appear in the topmost JSON object of a response" Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
