The Chairs have reviewed these last set of changes and believe them all
to be editorial.
As there have been no objections to resubmitting these documents the
Chairs will do so shortly.
Thanks to all,
Antoin and Jim
On 19 Jun 2020, at 9:47, James Galvin wrote:
REGEXT WG,
I’m sure you recall that the documents:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging/
Had been previously submitted to the IESG for consideration as
Proposed Standards on 25 May 2020. What you may not have noticed is
that our Area Director reviewed the documents prior to distributing
them to the entire IESG (this is an ordinary step in the process) and
requested some editorial changes to the documents prior to their
consideration for publication.
The authors have revised the documents as requested and now the Chairs
need to ask the working group to confirm that the proposed changes are
only editorial and not material.
You can go to the history tab for each document on the data tracker
and compare the most recent version to any prior version. The
following two links will compare the most recent versions to their
immediately preceding versions directly:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-11&url2=draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-12
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-13&url2=draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-14
Would you please review these documents prior to COB Thursday, 25 June
2020? If you have any concerns with or objections to the changes
please respond to the list. If there are no objections the Chairs
will resubmit the documents to the IESG on Friday, 26 June 2020.
Thanks in advance for your prompt attention,
Antoin and Jim
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
