Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. I have appreciated the examples of section 13. I am also support the "data at rest encryption" as noted by Roman's DISCUSS as by Carlos in his INTDIR review. Please address the issues found by Carlos during the INTDIR review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/8BJEPavSHK0BYTe_f1W1BFG-fwA Finally, for my own curiosity, is there a reason why using the word "watermark" rather than "timestamp" ? Regards, -éric _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
